We here at Chakra are committed to telling you the whole truth. We don't hide anything, although we have our own perspective, which is independent and not dictated to us by the GBC. At CHAKRA, although we are friends with the GBC, we only present our own views. We speak of our own free will.
Go to the Ritvik Page
|Ajamila's Question No. 1
Dear Adri Dharan Prabhu,
Please accept my most humble obeisances at your feet. All glories to Srila Prabhupada.
As an aspiring insignificant servant who wants more than anything to see Srila Prabhupadas ISKCON not disgraced but glorified, I beg you to answer the following question with all honesty at your command.
Srila Prabhupada clearly instructed that the GBC always has the final say in ISKCON. This is a fact which you, being a protagonist for a posthumous ritvik system in ISKCON, have recently admitted. I remind you that on 1 May on COM you wrote:
Here is how Srila Prabhupada defined the GBC:
So if you really are totally for GBC why do you rebel against Srila Prabhupadas instruction to fully co-operate with the GBC?
Even during Srila Prabhupadas physical presence, objections to GBC resolutions only went through an authorised forum at an appropriate time, or not at all. Srila Prabhupada clearly wanted everyone to co-operate fully with the GBC. Your rebellion against the GBCs unanimous decision against ritvikism clearly violates Srila Prabhupadas wishes.
Here is another GBC definition by Srila Prabhupada:
Srila Prabhupada often made it very clear that he was very displeased with devotees who did not co-operate with the GBC. ISKCON must have law and order. We cannot have a lawless society.
Over a period of nearly ten years the GBC have rejected all proposals for a posthumous ritvik system in ISKCON. This rejection was based upon extensive research by ISKCON scholars which culminated in a definitive paper entitled Prabhupadas Order. This year another ritvik proposal was submitted to the GBC in Mayapur but that too was unanimously rejected, surmising that ritvikism is a dangerous and devious concoction.
You stated that the GBC is not the GBC because they unanimously disagree with your ritvik concoction. Based on this most unreasonable explanation you have decided to rebel, defying Srila Prabhupadas authority system and emphatic instruction not to take a philosophical dispute outside ISKCON.
This illegitimate action of yours is what I would like to call into question.
Do you admit that you have acted illegitimately by
a) rebelling against Srila Prabhupadas GBC authority structure, being immensely frustrated with your year-after-year failed attempts to influence ISKCON with the ritvik concoction?
b) instigating directly or indirectly unauthorised and sometimes obscene, blasphemous, and harmful propaganda against the GBC, ISKCON, and ISKCON gurus?
c) disobeying Srila Prabhupadas clear instruction in Caitanya-caritamrita not to take philosophical disputes outside ISKCON since this can only harm the reputation of his preaching mission?
I appeal sincerely to your honesty: Failure to directly answer a) b) and c) without any evasion will no doubt be seen as a submission of guilt by the internet assembled devotees.
In your comment to my introduction you claimed that I contradicted myself and the GBC but your proof as usual did not match your claim. Please try to stick to disproving my evidence with REAL evidence rather than creating contradictions that are not only non-essential but unverifiable.
I respectfully remind you also that the purpose of this debate is to discuss the philosophy of initiation and its practical application in ISKCON which can only be truly understood by first observing strictly the proper procedure guidelines given by Srila Prabhupada. I believe that your procedural neglect is hampering your ability to understand why the GBC unanimously rejected your posthumous ritvikism as a dangerous and devious concoction.
Hoping to alleviate ISKCON from the grave disturbances caused by your unauthorised ritvikism,
your humble aspiring servant,
Ajamila Dasa Adhikari
Go to the Ritvik Page
Unless otherwise stated, all articles on CHAKRA are copyright by oldchakra.com. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced or reprinted without express written permission from the editors. For more information write to firstname.lastname@example.org. To contribute an article, read our editorial policy and submit it to email@example.com.
Some photographs and images used on this page may be copyright by the Bhaktivedanta Book Trust International. They are used with permission.
© Copyright November, 2003 by oldchakra.com. All rights reserved.
about this website or to report an
error, write to firstname.lastname@example.org